Employment Discrimination Against Medical Marijuana Users is Legal in California
Published by James Peters January 24th, 2008 in Discrimination, Policy : Opinion, Privacy IssuesWell, the California Supreme Court finally released its opinion in Ross v. Ragingwire Telecommunications, Inc., S138130, today and I have to say I am disappointed with the opinion, although I think the dissenting opinion was completely on the mark.
The Court decided that employers can terminate employees in California who use medical marijuana with a doctor’s prescription for a valid medical reason and not be held liable for doing so…
0 Comments DISCLAIMER
Employers Must At Least TRY To Accommodate Disabled Employees
Published by James Peters January 15th, 2008 in DiscriminationIn the United States, employers must actively engage in an “interactive process” with disabled employees to try and find a “reasonable accommodation” for their disability, even if no such accommodation actually exists.
What is an “Interactive Process”?
What this means is if an employer knows one of their employees is disabled and they suspect that employee might need some sort of accommodation (e.g. ergonomic keyboard, wheelchair ramp, a chair to sit in…
0 Comments DISCLAIMER
CA Supreme Court Considers Employees’ Medical Marijuana Use
Published by James Peters November 7th, 2007 in Discrimination, Policy : Opinion, Privacy Issues, Wrongful TerminationYesterday the California Supreme Court heard arguments in Ross v. Ragingwire Telecommunications, Inc.
In this case, the employee was refused employment because his pre-employment drug test came back positive for marijuana. The employee had been using medical marijuana at the direction of his physician to deal with lower back strain and muscle spasms.
Under California’s Compassionate Use Act, patients cannot be prosecuted under state law for using or possessing…
1 Comment DISCLAIMER

