<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ron Paul on Employee Rights (Part 3): Darn Those Pesky Civil Rights Laws</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.calemployeerightsblog.com/2008/01/17/ron-paul-on-employee-rights-part-3-darn-those-pesky-civil-rights/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.calemployeerightsblog.com/2008/01/17/ron-paul-on-employee-rights-part-3-darn-those-pesky-civil-rights/</link>
	<description>Employment Law Firm Blog</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 05:09:13 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: James Peters</title>
		<link>http://www.calemployeerightsblog.com/2008/01/17/ron-paul-on-employee-rights-part-3-darn-those-pesky-civil-rights/#comment-24749</link>
		<dc:creator>James Peters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 22:18:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calemployeerightsblog.com/2008/01/17/ron-paul-on-employee-rights-part-3-darn-those-pesky-civil-rights/#comment-24749</guid>
		<description>@Jonas: Mind reading" is not necessary and is not valid evidence to rule against an employer.  Unless there is actual proof of racial discrimination, it is highly unlikely that a court would rule against an employer. 

Additionally, "racial quotas" are illegal and a form of reverse racial discrimination that is just as illegal as discrimination against minorities by the private sector. 

Thank you for the comment, though.  Until I found these and other comments that I found offensive, I was actually a tentative fan of Ron Paul.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jonas: Mind reading&#8221; is not necessary and is not valid evidence to rule against an employer.  Unless there is actual proof of racial discrimination, it is highly unlikely that a court would rule against an employer. </p>
<p>Additionally, &#8220;racial quotas&#8221; are illegal and a form of reverse racial discrimination that is just as illegal as discrimination against minorities by the private sector. </p>
<p>Thank you for the comment, though.  Until I found these and other comments that I found offensive, I was actually a tentative fan of Ron Paul.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonas</title>
		<link>http://www.calemployeerightsblog.com/2008/01/17/ron-paul-on-employee-rights-part-3-darn-those-pesky-civil-rights/#comment-24189</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 23:25:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calemployeerightsblog.com/2008/01/17/ron-paul-on-employee-rights-part-3-darn-those-pesky-civil-rights/#comment-24189</guid>
		<description>What Ron Paul has also said about civil rights and what you ignored to paint it all black:

The Civil Rights Act of 1964 not only violated the Constitution and reduced individual liberty; it also failed to achieve its stated goals of promoting racial harmony and a color-blind society. Federal bureaucrats and judges cannot read minds to see if actions are motivated by racism. Therefore, the only way the federal government could ensure an employer was not violating the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was to ensure that the racial composition of a business's workforce matched the racial composition of a bureaucrat or judge's defined body of potential employees. Thus, bureaucrats began forcing employers to hire by racial quota. Racial quotas have not contributed to racial harmony or advanced the goal of a color-blind society. Instead, these quotas encouraged racial balkanization, and fostered racial strife.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What Ron Paul has also said about civil rights and what you ignored to paint it all black:</p>
<p>The Civil Rights Act of 1964 not only violated the Constitution and reduced individual liberty; it also failed to achieve its stated goals of promoting racial harmony and a color-blind society. Federal bureaucrats and judges cannot read minds to see if actions are motivated by racism. Therefore, the only way the federal government could ensure an employer was not violating the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was to ensure that the racial composition of a business&#8217;s workforce matched the racial composition of a bureaucrat or judge&#8217;s defined body of potential employees. Thus, bureaucrats began forcing employers to hire by racial quota. Racial quotas have not contributed to racial harmony or advanced the goal of a color-blind society. Instead, these quotas encouraged racial balkanization, and fostered racial strife.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
