<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Congress Tries to Legalize &#8220;English Only&#8221; Workplace Policies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.calemployeerightsblog.com/2007/11/20/congress-tries-to-legalize-english-only-workplace-policies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.calemployeerightsblog.com/2007/11/20/congress-tries-to-legalize-english-only-workplace-policies/</link>
	<description>Employment Law Firm Blog</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 05:44:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: The Laconic Law Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Virginia Bill Would Allow Employers To Fire Employees Who Do Not Speak English</title>
		<link>http://www.calemployeerightsblog.com/2007/11/20/congress-tries-to-legalize-english-only-workplace-policies/#comment-17171</link>
		<dc:creator>The Laconic Law Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Virginia Bill Would Allow Employers To Fire Employees Who Do Not Speak English</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 20:23:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calemployeerightsblog.com/2007/11/20/congress-tries-to-legalize-english-only-workplace-policies/#comment-17171</guid>
		<description>[...] California Employee Rights Blog &#8211; discusses attempts by Congress to legalize English-only policies (and notes that California law is more restrictive, in any event) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] California Employee Rights Blog &#8211; discusses attempts by Congress to legalize English-only policies (and notes that California law is more restrictive, in any event) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
