<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Congress Tries to Legalize &quot;English Only&quot; Workplace Policies</title> <atom:link href="http://www.calemployeerightsblog.com/2007/11/20/congress-tries-to-legalize-english-only-workplace-policies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.calemployeerightsblog.com/2007/11/20/congress-tries-to-legalize-english-only-workplace-policies/</link> <description>Employment Law Firm Blog</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 19:33:21 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: jai us citizen</title><link>http://www.calemployeerightsblog.com/2007/11/20/congress-tries-to-legalize-english-only-workplace-policies/comment-page-1/#comment-51822</link> <dc:creator>jai us citizen</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2010 05:25:05 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.calemployeerightsblog.com/2007/11/20/congress-tries-to-legalize-english-only-workplace-policies/#comment-51822</guid> <description>I&#039;m just wondering who is standing for the rights of all of those who speak english, why is it that we are in a country that the prime language is english, but those of us who only speak english, have to just shut up whenare co-workers are speaking their native language, hostile invironment for them, what about us. Why wouldn&#039;t anybody think this would be a hostile environment for those who speak only english, we have no idea what&#039;s being said or if it&#039;s being said about us. I just don&#039;t see how that&#039;s fair, the united states is a great country to live in and it should be respected as such,because if you came to this country to make it your home then learn it&#039;s language. If I was to move to a country who&#039;s prime language was not english I would have to learn their language and speak it, why not here? Who stands for the english speaking.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm just wondering who is standing for the rights of all of those who speak english, why is it that we are in a country that the prime language is english, but those of us who only speak english, have to just shut up whenare co-workers are speaking their native language, hostile invironment for them, what about us. Why wouldn't anybody think this would be a hostile environment for those who speak only english, we have no idea what's being said or if it's being said about us. I just don't see how that's fair, the united states is a great country to live in and it should be respected as such,because if you came to this country to make it your home then learn it's language. If I was to move to a country who's prime language was not english I would have to learn their language and speak it, why not here? Who stands for the english speaking.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Tennessee Passes Mean-Spirited &#34;English Only&#34; Law &#124; California Employee Rights Blog</title><link>http://www.calemployeerightsblog.com/2007/11/20/congress-tries-to-legalize-english-only-workplace-policies/comment-page-1/#comment-31841</link> <dc:creator>Tennessee Passes Mean-Spirited &#34;English Only&#34; Law &#124; California Employee Rights Blog</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 12:38:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.calemployeerightsblog.com/2007/11/20/congress-tries-to-legalize-english-only-workplace-policies/#comment-31841</guid> <description>[...] we have pointed out in the past, such laws are invalid because they violate Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, which [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] we have pointed out in the past, such laws are invalid because they violate Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, which [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: The Laconic Law Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Virginia Bill Would Allow Employers To Fire Employees Who Do Not Speak English</title><link>http://www.calemployeerightsblog.com/2007/11/20/congress-tries-to-legalize-english-only-workplace-policies/comment-page-1/#comment-17171</link> <dc:creator>The Laconic Law Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Virginia Bill Would Allow Employers To Fire Employees Who Do Not Speak English</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 20:23:52 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.calemployeerightsblog.com/2007/11/20/congress-tries-to-legalize-english-only-workplace-policies/#comment-17171</guid> <description>[...] California Employee Rights Blog &#8211; discusses attempts by Congress to legalize English-only policies (and notes that California law is more restrictive, in any event) [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] California Employee Rights Blog &#8211; discusses attempts by Congress to legalize English-only policies (and notes that California law is more restrictive, in any event) [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: www.calemployeerightsblog.com @ 2012-02-07 09:52:24 -->
