Congress Tries to Legalize "English Only" Workplace Policies

According to an article in today's Los Angeles Times, Congressional Republicans are pushing to amend federal anti-discrimination laws to do away with the provision that prohibits employers from requiring employees to only speak English at work.

Currently, under Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act such an "English-only" policy is considered national origin discrimination. There is a "business necessity" exception to this rule where speaking English is necessary to do the job. For example, a nurse who assists with surgeries must be able to speak English to communicate with the medical staff.

This amendment is unlikely to pass and is likely just pre-election posturing to bring the debate over immigration into the forefront of the electorate's consciousness.

However, most employees in California would not be affected by such a change, because California's Fair Employment and Housing Act also prevents English-only policies and is far more protective than Title VII in virtually all respects.

Related Posts

You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

2 Responses to “Congress Tries to Legalize "English Only" Workplace Policies”

  1. The Laconic Law Blog » Blog Archive » Virginia Bill Would Allow Employers To Fire Employees Who Do Not Speak English says:

    [...] California Employee Rights Blog – discusses attempts by Congress to legalize English-only policies (and notes that California law is more restrictive, in any event) [...]

  2. [...] we have pointed out in the past, such laws are invalid because they violate Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, which [...]

Leave a Reply

אורן יומטוב