Schwarzenegger “Terminates” Employee Rights (Part 3)-Family Values?
Published by James Peters November 5th, 2007 in Discrimination, Medical Leaves, Policy : LegislationThis is our final installment in a series dealing with employee rights laws that California’s legislature passed in 2007, but which Governor Schwarzenegger vetoed last month before they could take effect.
SB 836
Senate Bill 836 was heralded nationwide as the first law prohibiting employer discrimination against employees based on their “family status”.
For example, discrimination against employees who are single parents who have to take their child to the doctor would be prohibited. Also, if the child is sick at home and has nobody else to care for them, the employee could actually take protected, unpaid leave to do so.
I think this bill was a step in the right direction, but I do have to agree that its reach was far to broad to avoid the Governor’s veto stamp. If certain limits can be added to the measure to keep its use reasonable, I believe the legislature can pass a satisfactory bill in the near future.
Table of Contents for This Series
- Schwarzenegger “Terminates” Employee Rights (Part 1)-Why?
- Schwarzenegger “Terminates” Employee Rights (Part 2)-Difficult Choices
- Schwarzenegger “Terminates” Employee Rights (Part 3)-Family Values?
Tags
Discrimination | Family Medical Leave | Family Status | Medical Leave | News | Policy : Legislation
DISCLAIMER


0 Responses to “Schwarzenegger “Terminates” Employee Rights (Part 3)-Family Values?”
Please Wait
Leave a Reply