November 20th, 2007 
James PetersAccording to an article in today’s Los Angeles Times, Congressional Republicans are pushing to amend federal anti-discrimination laws to do away with the provision that prohibits employers from requiring employees to only speak English at work.
Currently, under Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act such an “English-only” policy is considered national origin discrimination. There is a “business necessity” exception to this rule where speaking English is necessary to… Continue reading
November 12th, 2007 James PetersSometimes employees use their employer’s e-mail address or computer to contact us. This is understandable, especially for long-term employees who spend most of their waking time at work or using a company-issued computer at home.
The problem is that using an employer’s computer or e-mail address to communicate with your attorney might mean these communications are not confidential and may have to be divulged in future litigation… Continue reading
November 7th, 2007 James PetersYesterday the California Supreme Court heard arguments in Ross v. Ragingwire Telecommunications, Inc.
In this case, the employee was refused employment because his pre-employment drug test came back positive for marijuana. The employee had been using medical marijuana at the direction of his physician to deal with lower back strain and muscle spasms.
Under California’s Compassionate Use Act, patients cannot be prosecuted under state law for using or possessing… Continue reading
November 6th, 2007 James PetersYesterday the California Supreme Court issued its decision in Gattuso v. Harte-Hanks Shoppers, Inc., ruling that employers may reimburse employee expenses in the form of “additional wages” payable in a “lump sum” instead of reimbursing each separate expense for the exact amount incurred.
This case deals with a scenario common to sales employees where the employer simply gives the employee a set automobile “allowance” or a “per diem” payment that is… Continue reading
November 6th, 2007 James PetersAs explained in various posts on this blog, California employees are presumed to deserve overtime pay for any hours worked over 40 in one week or 8 in one day, even if they are paid a salary, unless the employer can prove that an exemption to that rule applies.
The “computer software professionals” exemption is rarely used successfully by employers in overtime cases and such employees are usually non-exempt employees… Continue reading
Posted in Wages : Overtime 
Tags: California Employment Law, Wages : Overtime, Wages and Hours 
2 Comments »
RSS Feed