<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Military Leaves from Work Heavily Protected</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.calemployeerightsblog.com/2007/02/15/military-leaves-from-work-heavily-protected/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.calemployeerightsblog.com/2007/02/15/military-leaves-from-work-heavily-protected/</link>
	<description>Employment Law Firm Blog</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 05:12:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce Nye</title>
		<link>http://www.calemployeerightsblog.com/2007/02/15/military-leaves-from-work-heavily-protected/#comment-135</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce Nye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 19:52:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calemployeerightsblog.com/2007/02/15/military-leaves-from-work-heavily-protected/#comment-135</guid>
		<description>James, I assume you've seen Wallace v. City of San Diego from not long ago dealing with just this issue.  I blogged on this on February 12, more or less from the employer's perspective, although I have a hard time seeing how there could be an "employer's" and "employee's" perspective on this issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James, I assume you&#8217;ve seen Wallace v. City of San Diego from not long ago dealing with just this issue.  I blogged on this on February 12, more or less from the employer&#8217;s perspective, although I have a hard time seeing how there could be an &#8220;employer&#8217;s&#8221; and &#8220;employee&#8217;s&#8221; perspective on this issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
