<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Q&amp;A: Restrictions on Bad References by Former Employers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.calemployeerightsblog.com/2007/01/25/qa-restrictions-on-bad-references-by-former-employers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.calemployeerightsblog.com/2007/01/25/qa-restrictions-on-bad-references-by-former-employers/</link>
	<description>Employment Law Firm Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 20:40:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete Johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.calemployeerightsblog.com/2007/01/25/qa-restrictions-on-bad-references-by-former-employers/comment-page-1/#comment-31503</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 22:41:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calemployeerightsblog.com/2007/01/25/qa-restrictions-on-bad-references-by-former-employers/#comment-31503</guid>
		<description>Great advice. In my experience, prospective employers don&#039;t tell you if you had a bad reference, when pressed, they simply claim that another applicant was better qualified. This service also avoids the problems associated with secretly recording telephone calls. In some states it it illegal, while in other states one party to the conversation may consent to the recording.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great advice. In my experience, prospective employers don't tell you if you had a bad reference, when pressed, they simply claim that another applicant was better qualified. This service also avoids the problems associated with secretly recording telephone calls. In some states it it illegal, while in other states one party to the conversation may consent to the recording.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Slate Levy</title>
		<link>http://www.calemployeerightsblog.com/2007/01/25/qa-restrictions-on-bad-references-by-former-employers/comment-page-1/#comment-28797</link>
		<dc:creator>Slate Levy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:04:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calemployeerightsblog.com/2007/01/25/qa-restrictions-on-bad-references-by-former-employers/#comment-28797</guid>
		<description>I used their Canadian office (same type of service I guess).  Their report showed that my ex-supervisor was slandering me to potential employers.  My attorney got me a pretty good settlement.  Best of all, my ex-supervisor got fired.  How&#039;s that for justice!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used their Canadian office (same type of service I guess).  Their report showed that my ex-supervisor was slandering me to potential employers.  My attorney got me a pretty good settlement.  Best of all, my ex-supervisor got fired.  How's that for justice!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zachary Farina</title>
		<link>http://www.calemployeerightsblog.com/2007/01/25/qa-restrictions-on-bad-references-by-former-employers/comment-page-1/#comment-28544</link>
		<dc:creator>Zachary Farina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 10:20:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calemployeerightsblog.com/2007/01/25/qa-restrictions-on-bad-references-by-former-employers/#comment-28544</guid>
		<description>The reason I used Documented Reference Check was because they use Certified Court Reporters. I didn&#039;t want any problems with opposing attorneys challenging the report.  It worked.  Thanks for the recommendation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reason I used Documented Reference Check was because they use Certified Court Reporters. I didn't want any problems with opposing attorneys challenging the report.  It worked.  Thanks for the recommendation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joyce Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.calemployeerightsblog.com/2007/01/25/qa-restrictions-on-bad-references-by-former-employers/comment-page-1/#comment-28499</link>
		<dc:creator>Joyce Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 01:20:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calemployeerightsblog.com/2007/01/25/qa-restrictions-on-bad-references-by-former-employers/#comment-28499</guid>
		<description>I used www.badreferences.com and caught my slimy ex-boss slandering me.  These guys (Documented Reference Check) really know what they are doing.  They settled as soon as they heard the name, &quot;Documented Reference Check.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used <a href="http://www.badreferences.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.badreferences.com</a> and caught my slimy ex-boss slandering me.  These guys (Documented Reference Check) really know what they are doing.  They settled as soon as they heard the name, "Documented Reference Check."</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
