<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Mandatory Arbitration &quot;Trick&quot; Risky for All and Good for None</title> <atom:link href="http://www.calemployeerightsblog.com/2007/01/14/mandatory-arbitration-risky-for-all-and-good-for-none/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.calemployeerightsblog.com/2007/01/14/mandatory-arbitration-risky-for-all-and-good-for-none/</link> <description>Employment Law Firm Blog</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 19:33:21 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Peter Mullison</title><link>http://www.calemployeerightsblog.com/2007/01/14/mandatory-arbitration-risky-for-all-and-good-for-none/comment-page-1/#comment-4</link> <dc:creator>Peter Mullison</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 02:17:21 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.calemployeerightsblog.com/2007/01/14/mandatory-arbitration-risky-for-all-and-good-for-none/#comment-4</guid> <description>Coincidentally, I happen to be drafting an arbitration agreement for one of my clients.  Before I give it to him, I&#039;ll make sure and go over the points you and Jay make.
Peter Mullison
www.employmentlawcolorado.com</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Coincidentally, I happen to be drafting an arbitration agreement for one of my clients.  Before I give it to him, I'll make sure and go over the points you and Jay make.</p><p>Peter Mullison<br
/> <a
href="http://www.employmentlawcolorado.com" rel="nofollow" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.employmentlawcolorado.com?referer=');">http://www.employmentlawcolorado.com</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jay Shepherd</title><link>http://www.calemployeerightsblog.com/2007/01/14/mandatory-arbitration-risky-for-all-and-good-for-none/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link> <dc:creator>Jay Shepherd</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 14 Jan 2007 17:00:42 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.calemployeerightsblog.com/2007/01/14/mandatory-arbitration-risky-for-all-and-good-for-none/#comment-3</guid> <description>James, you&#039;re absolutely right. More employers should analyze mandatory arbitration under the law of unintended consequences. Isn&#039;t it cool when a management lawyer and an employees&#039; lawyer can agree? Keep up the good work on your blawg. Best regards, Jay</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James, you're absolutely right. More employers should analyze mandatory arbitration under the law of unintended consequences. Isn't it cool when a management lawyer and an employees' lawyer can agree? Keep up the good work on your blawg. Best regards, Jay</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: www.calemployeerightsblog.com @ 2012-02-07 09:47:43 -->
