<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mandatory Arbitration &quot;Trick&quot; Risky for All and Good for None</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.calemployeerightsblog.com/2007/01/14/mandatory-arbitration-risky-for-all-and-good-for-none/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.calemployeerightsblog.com/2007/01/14/mandatory-arbitration-risky-for-all-and-good-for-none/</link>
	<description>Employment Law Firm Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 20:40:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Mullison</title>
		<link>http://www.calemployeerightsblog.com/2007/01/14/mandatory-arbitration-risky-for-all-and-good-for-none/comment-page-1/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Mullison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 02:17:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calemployeerightsblog.com/2007/01/14/mandatory-arbitration-risky-for-all-and-good-for-none/#comment-4</guid>
		<description>Coincidentally, I happen to be drafting an arbitration agreement for one of my clients.  Before I give it to him, I&#039;ll make sure and go over the points you and Jay make.

Peter Mullison
www.employmentlawcolorado.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Coincidentally, I happen to be drafting an arbitration agreement for one of my clients.  Before I give it to him, I'll make sure and go over the points you and Jay make.</p>
<p>Peter Mullison<br />
<a href="http://www.employmentlawcolorado.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.employmentlawcolorado.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Shepherd</title>
		<link>http://www.calemployeerightsblog.com/2007/01/14/mandatory-arbitration-risky-for-all-and-good-for-none/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Shepherd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jan 2007 17:00:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calemployeerightsblog.com/2007/01/14/mandatory-arbitration-risky-for-all-and-good-for-none/#comment-3</guid>
		<description>James, you&#039;re absolutely right. More employers should analyze mandatory arbitration under the law of unintended consequences. Isn&#039;t it cool when a management lawyer and an employees&#039; lawyer can agree? Keep up the good work on your blawg. Best regards, Jay</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James, you're absolutely right. More employers should analyze mandatory arbitration under the law of unintended consequences. Isn't it cool when a management lawyer and an employees' lawyer can agree? Keep up the good work on your blawg. Best regards, Jay</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
