Comments on: Mandatory Arbitration “Trick” Risky for All and Good for None http://www.calemployeerightsblog.com/2007/01/14/mandatory-arbitration-risky-for-all-and-good-for-none/ Fri, 04 Jul 2008 13:30:42 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 By: Peter Mullison http://www.calemployeerightsblog.com/2007/01/14/mandatory-arbitration-risky-for-all-and-good-for-none/#comment-4 Peter Mullison Tue, 16 Jan 2007 02:17:21 +0000 http://www.calemployeerightsblog.com/2007/01/14/mandatory-arbitration-risky-for-all-and-good-for-none/#comment-4 Coincidentally, I happen to be drafting an arbitration agreement for one of my clients. Before I give it to him, I'll make sure and go over the points you and Jay make. Peter Mullison www.employmentlawcolorado.com Coincidentally, I happen to be drafting an arbitration agreement for one of my clients. Before I give it to him, I’ll make sure and go over the points you and Jay make.

Peter Mullison
http://www.employmentlawcolorado.com

]]> By: Jay Shepherd http://www.calemployeerightsblog.com/2007/01/14/mandatory-arbitration-risky-for-all-and-good-for-none/#comment-3 Jay Shepherd Sun, 14 Jan 2007 17:00:42 +0000 http://www.calemployeerightsblog.com/2007/01/14/mandatory-arbitration-risky-for-all-and-good-for-none/#comment-3 James, you're absolutely right. More employers should analyze mandatory arbitration under the law of unintended consequences. Isn't it cool when a management lawyer and an employees' lawyer can agree? Keep up the good work on your blawg. Best regards, Jay James, you’re absolutely right. More employers should analyze mandatory arbitration under the law of unintended consequences. Isn’t it cool when a management lawyer and an employees’ lawyer can agree? Keep up the good work on your blawg. Best regards, Jay

]]>